Modernist Afterlives: Critique, Literature, Theory
Ian Ellison (University of Kent), John Greaney (Goethe University Frankfurt), Mimi Lu (University of Oxford)
This panel examines and intervenes in the conceptual criteria of modernist afterlives, a topic, and now a field, which has gained a lot of critical attention over the last decade. The notion of a modernist afterlife, lineage, or legacy has expanded the remit and scope of modernist literature right into the present day; so much so that we can diagnose an obsession with modernism in contemporary letters and its critique. A host of the accounts which comprise this domain of study have been liberal, if not methodologically neo-liberal (both Sally Rooney and Elena Ferrante, for example, have recently been dubbed modernist inheritors), in their definition of modernism and how it recurs in twenty-first century letters. In response to this freedom with which a legacy of modernism now operates in contemporary literature and its critique, and which suspends any kind of ‘experimental’ or ‘innovative’ literature in a modernist limbo, this panel tackles and answers differently, a question that has recently been raised by Urmila Seshagiri. She asks: ‘What distinguishes modernism’s legacies from the afterlives of other literary or cultural movements?’ Addressing this question necessarily entails providing a specific definition of the terms ‘modernism’ and ‘afterlife’. Responding to Seshagiri’s question, Ian Ellison (University of Kent), John Greaney (Goethe University Frankfurt) and Mimi Lu (University of Oxford) ask what form(s) of modernism precede(s) a modernist afterlife and what theories of afterlife enable a finer description of a twenty-first century modernism. Critically analysing recent ideas of late modernism, meta-modernism, neo-modernism, and post-postmodernism, while also interrogating Any Warburg’s notion of Nachleben (‘after-life’) against Walter Benjamin’s preferred term Fortleben, (‘living forth’) and Jacques Derrida’s ideas on haunting and survivance (‘survival’), the panellists seek to refine the conceptual criteria through which we understand ‘modernist afterlives’.
Interested scholars are invited to send their proposal, including a short bio and 300-word abstract, to email@example.com by 15 February 2023. The proposal must include the title of both the individual paper and the panel session.